The bonding hypothesis of takeover defenses: Evidence from IPO firms

  • Johnson, William C.
  • Karpoff, Jonathan M.
  • Yi, Sangho
Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

102
Citations

SCOPUS

106

초록

We propose and test an efficiency explanation for why Firms deploy takeover defenses using initial public offering (IPO) firm data. We hypothesize that takeover defenses bond the firm's commitments by reducing the likelihood that an outside takeover will change the firm's operating strategy and impose costs on its business partners. Consistent with this hypothesis, we find that IPO firms deploy more takeover defenses when they have important business relationships to protect. An IPO firm's use of takeover defenses is positively related to the longevity of its business relationships. IPO firms' use of takeover defenses creates positive spillovers for their large customers. And IPO firms' valuation and subsequent operating performance are positively related to their use of takeover defenses when they have important business relationships. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

키워드

Antitakeover provisionsTakeover defensesIPOBondingOPERATING PERFORMANCECORPORATE GOVERNANCEMARKETEQUITYACQUISITIONOWNERSHIPQUALITYWEALTHBOARDSRIGHTS
제목
The bonding hypothesis of takeover defenses: Evidence from IPO firms
저자
Johnson, William C.Karpoff, Jonathan M.Yi, Sangho
DOI
10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.03.008
발행일
2015-08
유형
Article
저널명
Journal of Financial Economics
117
2
페이지
307 ~ 332